Latest Update- Twists and Turns in the Bailey case

Frisco Paul's Experience is the best example of how an innocent man can sit in prison because evidence collected via body cam was tampered with after the fact!  Only after trial and by having experts double checking experts did we find that the erased audio portion (the warning yelled out to the owner's son Rick that proved that Mr. Bailey acted in accordance with Texas' Castle Law!) would be retrieved from the car dash cam over 100 feet away from the home!

Please share this story, of Police Abuse and evidence tampering    www.friscopaul.blogspot.com

You can read the grounds for new trial below (definitely worth the read), but you must take a look at the Latest News.  It's beyond bizarre!

Latest News on Case:

Recently we got a report that a key piece of evidence was forged.  The signature that was forged was none other than the late Detective Debra Stansell.  

July 2014- Ex-Officer Greer resigned and was dishonorably discharged for sexual misconduct with a rape victim who later turned up murdered.   He was also decertified for any testimony, endangering hundreds of cases.

Frisco Texas did an “audit” of cases he worked on (so they could feign responsible behavior)   and found 3 more instances of sexual misconduct but clearly failed to look at other improprieties. Why? Because in Paul Bailey's Case, the city has major liability in that not only was evidence tampered with, but the police assisted the bogus 911 caller with a theft of Mr. Bailey's home. The "erased evidence" (deemed "criminally altered" by one of the experts we had look at the evidence) from Greer's lapel mic proving Bailey's innocence was recently recovered (after trial and incompetent legal assistance) from the car audio as well. Detective Debra Stansell (who Bailey hoped to have testify) showed up dead to suspicious circumstances just a few weeks before trial.

http://www.dallasnews.com/news/community-news/frisco/headlines/20140709-frisco-detectives-sexual-misconduct-may-jeopardize-trials.ece

Sept 2014- The city attorney (Rebecca Hendricks Brewer) was also recently arrested for cutting her boyfriend and shooting out his windshield. She was formerly married to the 366th Judge Greg Brewer who abruptly resigned 2 days after Bailey was arrested. They are now divorced. What does he know ?

http://www.dallasnews.com/news/community-news/frisco/headlines/20140709-frisco-detectives-sexual-misconduct-may-jeopardize-trials.ece
   

By the way, we're not sure if this should be a comedy or a drama!

Note to Readers:  Please note that since Mr. Bailey's Writ of Habeas was filed, several issues must clearly be understood:

1)  The primary witness Detective Debra Stansell was unable to testify due to her untimely and suspicious death (officially ruled a suicide).

2)  The primary witness that testified former detective Scott Greer:

             a.     has been Dishonorably discharged from the Frisco Police Department for sexual misconduct with a rape victim whose case he was assigned who later became a murder victim, prompting Texas Rangers to begin looking at the case.  

             b.   Secondly he has been barred as a witness for the prosecution which has affected hundreds of cases.   

              c.  Frisco PD only conducted an "audit" for the cases he was assigned to in the criminal investigation division, NOT for cases he worked on as a patrol officer (which would have included Mr. Bailey's case).   Please also note that they apparently were fixated on finding additional sexual misconduct, not OTHER TYPES of misconduct or malfeasance (as we will show in the following discussion).   We believe this reflects obvious malfeasance/cover up  by the Frisco Police Department on covering up at least some of  their employee misconduct. 

               d.  From the following article we highlight and quote Greer's own admission of additional sexual malfeasance):

"Greer testified at a hearing Monday that he had sex one time with the victim in a pending misdemeanor assault case. He also testified he had sex with the mother of a defendant after charges against her son were dropped. In addition, he said he met the mother of a victim in a sexual assault case at a hotel for sex."

http://www.dallasnews.com/news/community-news/frisco/headlines/20140709-frisco-detectives-sexual-misconduct-may-jeopardize-trials.ece

         3)   The Frisco City Attorney Rebecca Brewer was arrested for cutting her boyfriend and shooting out his car window.   

http://crimeblog.dallasnews.com/2014/08/mckinney-attorney-arrested-for-aggravated-assault.html/

Texas Rangers aren't interested in looking into Detective Debra Stansell's suspicious "suicide" since they don't "have the manpower" and they don't like my blog!  Hellooooo- there wouldn't need to be a blog had anyone done their jobs-including my court-appointed public pretenders, Gregg Gibbs, Mark Ledbetter, and the latest, Stephanie Hudson- who won't contact me despite my requests!

The following is the Writ of Habeas that I and my team of volunteers compiled and the links to the documents supporting this writ follow.

GROUND ONE:

Tampering of police certified audio/video tape

FACTS SUPPORTING GROUND ONE:

1) Audio from video evidence was discovered and confirmed by multiple forensics experts to have been tampered with. The 4 seconds in Greer's lapel mic was to erase Applicant’s explicit warning to the perceived burglar [whom Applicant called out by name], which would demonstrate with absolute certainty that Applicant did not know that the person on his property [Greer] was a police officer and acted in accordance with Castle Law.

2) Office Greer stated later on the audio video evidence “I don’t think he could see me, though. Have Dispatch call the Reporting Party to call him and let him know it's the (expletive) Police”.

3) In addition, there is a 5 minute blanked out spot in the Claussen video.

4) Applicant discovered the tampering of the evidence by having the two police certified

audio tapes analyzed by several experts in order to have undisputable proof, that is “experts checking experts”.

5)Furthermore, no gunshot is heard on the lapel mic and even though the audio (after tampered spot) is back on, it is not heard. This has been proven by syncing the car audio with the lapel mic audio. This proves that Officer Greer was farther away from the residence than the car because the gunshot is heard on the car audio.

6) An audio engineer was able to enhance the sound from the car audio and retrieve the missing 4 second spot that was tampered with and prove that Applicant was calling out to the perceived intruder and acted in complete accordance with Texas' Castle Law Note: Applicant's son was also the bogus 911 caller who needed his father out of the house in order to take the items needed to complete a car purchase the following day. In fact, he did just that with the assistance of police who invited him into the home once applicant was arrested, despite Applicant's express directions not to allow him into the home. Son is serving sentence for stealing applicant's identity and other items with the help of police).

7) Finally, Greer testified that he never turns off his mic. A beep occurs just prior to the blank 4 second spot. The National Center for Audio Visual Forensics stated clearly in an email that a beep occurs whenever the mic is turned off. Had Trial Counsel been effective, he would have clearly made the point to ask Greer why a beep occurred there if he never turned off his mic. This illustrates that the altering party knew the idiosyncrasies of the L3 Mobile Vision Software, but did not know that Greer's future testimony regarding his routine would contradict tape

GROUND TWO: 

False testimony given by Frisco Police Officer Scott Greer and 911 operator Delanna Copeland.

FACTS SUPPORTING GROUND TWO:

1) Delanna Copeland violated proper police protocols when she did not question 911 caller's authenticity/motives when she did not question why his stated location differed from his actual location.

2) Greer was wearing a lapel audio transmitter, Lapel audio tape and car audio/video evidences that Officer Greer did not:

(a) park in front of the home,

(b) have his lights on, 
(c) wait for backup,
(d) nor did he announce himself as a police officer when he entered Applicant’s property and approached Applicant’s home.  
(e) have a warrant nor consent to enter Applicant’s property, 
(f) have probable cause to do so,  
(g) note any exigent circumstances present, and  
(h) note problems. He stated in Police Report that Applicant was watching TV and drinking a beer (meaning no problems observed).

3) The audio recording further evidences that Applicant did not know that the person on his property [Greer] was a police officer. Officer Greer falsely testified that Applicant knew he was a police officer and intended to shoot at him. Officer Greer falsely asserted that he could see the muzzle fire from the gun held in the Applicant's hand .

4) In contradiction to his testimony in court, Officer Greer expressly states on the lapel mic that, “I don't think [Applicant] could see me” and asks to “have dispatch call the [reporting party] to call [Applicant] and let him know it’s the [expletive] police”

5) Due to recent forensic experts looking at the evidence, it is clear that Officer Greer was nowhere near the Applicant’s door when the gun was shot as the gunshot was not recorded on Officer’s lapel mic audio, but WAS recorded on the car audio which was 100+ feet away. Officer Greer falsely testified that he was in front of the door when the gun was shot. The tampered spot was a 4 second spot BEFORE the area where the gunshot should have been recorded and the sound comes back on in time for it to have been recorded-however the gunshot is not where it should have been.

6) A Forensic expert has now been able to enhance Applicant's warning to perceived burglar from the CAR audio. (This is the 4 second spot that was erased/tampered with from the lapel mic audio). This also proves that Applicant was acting in accordance with Texas' Castle Law. This warning has been confirmed by another expert.

GROUND THREE:

False report given by court appointed authenticator, Herbert Joe regarding the audio tape

FACTS SUPPORTING GROUND THREE:

1. Report did not state the evidence of tampering.
2. Joe’s report did not synchronize the two audios properly and detect that Officer Greer's testimony was false considering the scientific impossibility of him being where he said he was that is, near Applicant’s door.
   
   
3. Further, Joe’s report did not state that Officer Greer expressly mentioned that Applicant did not know that the person on his property was a police officer.
   
   
4. The report also did not state that no gunshot was audible from Officer Greer’s lapel audio transmitter and that the audio recording only picked up static, not the sound of a gunshot. The gunshot was recorded in the car audio 100+ feet away and WAS recorded on the car audio.
   
   
5. Joe's report did not state why his report was so radically different from the text messages originally sent to Counsel Raphael DeLagarza and Applicant.

GROUND FOUR: Ineffective Counsel sabotaged Applicant's defense

Trial counsel sabotaged Applicant's defense by not questioning and investigating tampered evidence, multiple breaches of police protocol by 911 dispatcher and Officers, did not point out and argue that Greer's recorded statements on the audio that evening impeached his testimony on the stand when he stated that “I don't think he could see me though” and “Have Dispatch call the RP (reporting party) and have him call him and tell him it's the (expletive) Police!”. Counsel did not challenge State's failure to provide all evidence prior to trial. Trial counsel sabotaged Applicant's defense, was hostile to defendant, did not adequately question or have confirmation of strange spots on audio examined, took police dismissive attitude that the 4 second erased spot was “a glitch”, and sabotaged defense of client, by not questioning and investigating into the same. Counsel failed to obtain relevant testimony, evidence, & analysis, and a serious, competent defense strategy as agreed to in front of the Judge and question the tampered evidence (and evidence never provided) has resulted in the jury finding the Applicant guilty. Counsel acted with malice and contributed to a successful malicious prosecution by the Ass't. DA. Counsel had a conflict of interest with head Detective's family. Counsel stated to Applicant's Daughter and Ex-Wife that he never takes these types of cases and only did so because of the Judge's insistence. Applicant has now discovered evidence presented in the trial court was tampered with. Proper analysis of audio/video tape by MULTIPLE experts proves that false testimony was given by Officer Greer regarding Applicant’s arrest and the court appointed authenticator, Herbert Joe also gave a false report on the audio/video tape.

FACTS SUPPORTING GROUND FOUR:

1. Counsel deliberately misled Applicant by stating the sound on lapel mic recording was a gunshot, when it was static background noise and not the sound of gunshot.
   
   
2. Trial counsel ignored the fact that Joe’s initial texts to previously counsel, Raphael Delagarza were different from the final report.
   
   
3. Applicant’s counsel failed to question about the 5 minute blanked spot where there is no audio in the Claussen Video.
   
   
4. Counsel failed to question Joe about the syncing of the lapel & car videos and investigate the missing gunshot on the lapel mic, which would have proven that Greer was not where he said he was and that no assault occurred.
   
   
5. Applicant’s counsel did not challenge the State’s failure to provide ALL evidence to Applicant before trial. In fact, to this day, much evidence has still been withheld despite the Attorney Generals directive to turn it over to Applicant.
   
   
6. Counsel ignored Officer Greer’s multiple breaches of police protocol. Counsel failed to question the credibility of the 911 emergency dispatch caller which evidenced that the caller while stating he was out of state was, in fact, in Fort Worth, Texas.
   
   
7. When Prosecutors showed a timeline “showing” that communication for several hours occurred with Applicant, Applicant asked counsel to object because it was not supported by forensic evidence, Mark Ledbetter told his Client to “Shut the (expletive) up”.
   
   
8. Counsel did not point that Greer's recorded statements impeached his testimony when he stated that “I don't think he could see me though” and “Have Dispatch call the RP (reporting party) and have him call him and tell him it's the (expletive) Police!”
   
   
9. Applicant’s counsel further accepted the position during questioning at trial that the erased portion of the recording was a glitch, rather than tampered evidence. Counsel failed to ask Greer why a beep occurred prior to blank 4 second spot if he never turned off his mic, thereby proving that the altering party knew the idiosyncrasies of the L3 Mobile Vision System, but did NOT know (at time of tampering) that Greer's testimony regarding his routine would contradict the beep and blanked out spot.
   
   
10. Counsel failed to obtain witnesses, experts, analysis that could have assisted in a competent defense. Counsel failed to provide the court with police reports of the police assisted theft that occurred after Applicant was arrested.
    
    
11. Counsel refused to raise Applicant's strategy of defense even though he confirmed his agreement (to the court) to utilize this strategy. It is for this reason and this reason only that Applicant agreed to have him represent him.
    
    
12. Counsel failed to introduce Son's arrest and incarceration record, Multiple threats and text to “leave his stuff outside” as support for the state of mind of the Applicant.
    
    
13. Counsel failed to point out the fraudulent, retroactively altered “original” indictment and ask why would an indictment time-stamped almost 18 months prior to the Motion to Amend with the exact same font and phraseology, need to be “amended”?
    
    
14. Counsel failed to point out that in no way, is Applicant responsible for the bogus 911 call made by his son to 911, or the 911 Operator and Police making no less than five (5) critical errors in their duties which led up to the event. 

Links to source documents:


1)  The first file is the Habeas Cover Sheet required by the State of Texas.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B0A0RQkG9cOEb1hCR3Q5YUNDeDA/edit?usp=sharing

2) The 2nd file, continues the motion.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B0A0RQkG9cOETjE5Uk42TGgxQkk/edit?usp=sharing

3) The 3rd through 7th  files are attachments and evidence.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B0A0RQkG9cOEVF9ZU3VUVnFPR1U/edit?usp=sharing

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B0A0RQkG9cOEbzJTVDkweVdDdkE/edit?usp=sharing

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B0A0RQkG9cOEalpwcENZU1FweUk/edit?usp=sharing

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B0A0RQkG9cOEV0RrMmlINDZaS1k/edit?usp=sharing

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B0A0RQkG9cOEMTMyYXNhSGlROGc/edit?usp=sharing



Collin County District Attorney Used and Endorsed Tampered Evidence at Trial, Frisco Detective Dishonorable Discharge. Debra Stansell suspicious suicide, Frisco Texas Police assisted Theft of Citizen,  Frisco Texas Police Assisted Theft of Citizen Paul Bailey, Frisco Texas Attorney Rebecca Brewer arrested for cutting boyfriend and shooting out his car window,  Ex Frisco PD Detective Scott Greer Dishonorably Discharged and Decertified from testimony in two counties,  Collin County District Attorney Greg Willis used and endorsed tampered evidence in the Paul Bailey Trial

 

BANK OF AMERICA, COHORTS IN MALICIOUS PROSECUTION

Note to Readers:  This post spells out how banks can be used to damage those accused of crimes (even though innocent) to pull the financial rug out from under them so they cannot afford decent legal assistance to defend themselves.  In this case,  Bank of America pulled a previously approved loan modification from Paul Bailey so he could not access his equity to get an attorney to defend himself from the police abuse and police assisted theft that occurred in 2009.

By Paul Bailey, recorded and transcribed

May share with link to friscopaul.BlogSpot.com

Undoubtedly, neither Donna Steinberg, Maria Pappa, Mario Pappa, Thomas A. Schroder, or Christian Choagua had any personal involvement. One or more of them will, however, likely have a recollection and/or insight into the highly suspect actions by Bank of America’s Home Loan Modification department (located incidentally only a few miles from my home in Frisco, TX). I reference the refused payment and therefore, certainly granted, loan modification of my home immediately after Frisco PD's vigilante malfeasance June 29, 2009.

The events since that time have been culminated in a malicious prosecution involving the city of Frisco, Collin County and Dallas County D.A.'s office and the bankruptcy court who heard the enjoin motion and denied it improperly stands as undeniable suspect motive that involves an ongoing civil suit between myself and Bank of America.

Yet to be revealed, is the exact executive within Bank of America’s Loan Modification department that the city of Frisco may have solicited being identified. The obvious egregious flaws shall assuredly solicit real prosecutions of its own merit when the underlings that facilitated the event, come under scrutiny of federal crimes. Properly assessed criminal penalties have a way of causing potential jail birds to sing like canaries.

There’s been thus far by the court, a motion for summary judgment granted. A highly improper granted motion for some judgment void of proper, legal premise. So, the court's actions may require a petition for quo warranto to remedy that injustice. Should that be necessary; so be it.

I make no reservations to exercise my rights to express my ultimate disdain to the circle jerk, kangaroo court proceedings that I have been subjected to, or shall I say “had inflicted upon myself” a proven, actual innocent man. Quo warranto serves a very good purpose. That purpose cannot be better represented in the words of our own late, great President Abraham Lincoln. "The people of the United States of America are the rightful masters of both the congress and the courts. Not to overthrow the constitution, but the men who pervert the constitution."

PROOF THAT "ATTORNEYS" GREGG GIBBS AND MARK LEDBETTER GAVE FALSE AFFIDAVITS TO COURT AND KNEW PAUL BAILEY SUSPECTED TAMPERING

1)  The first item we will show you is Gregg Gibbs agreement to utilize Mr.  Bailey's defense strategy-  of course now we know that would win and Gibbs never intended to provide a robust defense.  Gregg Gibbs confirmed in front of the Judge and the Court Reporter that he and Mr. Bailey had agreed that he would be the attorney instead of Mr. Bailey representing himself.    In addition, Mr. Bailey that Gregg had agreed to utilize his strategy.  See photos of transcript are shown below.

2) The next item is the grounds against "Attorneys" Gregg Gibbs and Mark Ledbetter that are contained in the Writ of Habeas delivered to Collin County Courthouse in February 2014.

3)  The third items are the affidavits that they just sent to the Judge.

4)  Then we will show you the emails  the emails back and forth to their offices where Mr. Bailey was trying to get them to investigate the facts of the case,   he also laid out his strategy for his defense in the attachment that we have printed and scanned.  

Here are the facts supporting the Grounds against them (please bear in mind there are several other Grounds and the reading is very interesting, but these are the ones that pertain to the two Court Appointed Public Pretenders who we assume perpetrate that fraud on a daily basis upon both the public and any unfortunate soul that gets them appointed to their case.

GROUND FOUR: Ineffective Counsel sabotaged Applicant's defense
 

Trial counsel sabotaged Applicant's defense by not questioning and investigating tampered evidence, multiple breaches of police protocol by 911 dispatcher and Officers, did not point out and argue that Greer's recorded statements on the audio that evening impeached his testimony on the stand when he stated that “I don't think he could see me though” and “Have Dispatch call the RP (reporting party) and have him call him and tell him it's the (expletive) Police!”. Counsel did not challenge State's failure to provide all evidence prior to trial. Trial counsel sabotaged Applicant's defense, was hostile to defendant, did not adequately question or have confirmation of strange spots on audio examined, took police dismissive attitude that the 4 second erased spot was “a glitch”, and sabotaged defense of client, by not questioning and investigating into the same. Counsel failed to obtain relevant testimony, evidence, & analysis, and a serious, competent defense strategy as agreed to in front of the Judge and question the tampered evidence (and evidence never provided) has resulted in the jury finding the Applicant guilty. Counsel acted with malice and contributed to a successful malicious prosecution by the Ass't. DA. Counsel had a conflict of interest with head Detective's family. Counsel stated to Applicant's Daughter and Ex-Wife that he never takes these types of cases and only did so because of the Judge's insistence. Applicant has now discovered evidence presented in the trial court was tampered with. Proper analysis of audio/video tape by MULTIPLE experts proves that false testimony was given by Officer Greer regarding Applicant’s arrest and the court appointed authenticator, Herbert Joe also gave a false report on the audio/video tape.

FACTS SUPPORTING GROUND FOUR:

1. Counsel deliberately misled Applicant by stating the sound on lapel mic recording was a gunshot, when it was static background noise and not the sound of gunshot.
2. Trial counsel ignored the fact that Joe’s initial texts to previously counsel, Raphael Delagarza were different from the final report.
3. Applicant’s counsel failed to question about the 5 minute blanked spot where there is no audio in the Claussen Video.
4.  Counsel failed to question Joe about the syncing of the lapel & car videos and investigate the missing gunshot on the lapel mic, which would have proven that Greer was not where he said he was and that no assault occurred.
5. Applicant’s counsel did not challenge the State’s failure to provide ALL evidence to Applicant before trial. In fact, to this day, much evidence has still been withheld despite the Attorney Generals directive to turn it over to Applicant.

6. Counsel ignored Officer Greer’s multiple breaches of police protocol. Counsel failed to question the credibility of the 911 emergency dispatch caller which evidenced that the caller while stating he was out of state was, in fact, in Fort Worth, Texas.
7. When Prosecutors showed a timeline “showing” that communication for several hours occurred with Applicant, Applicant asked counsel to object because it was not supported by forensic evidence, Mark Ledbetter told his Client to “Shut the (expletive) up”.
8. Counsel did not point that Greer's recorded statements impeached his testimony when he stated that “I don't think he could see me though” and “Have Dispatch call the RP (reporting party) and have him call him and tell him it's the (expletive) Police!”
9. Applicant’s counsel further accepted the position during questioning at trial that the erased portion of the recording was a glitch, rather than tampered evidence. Counsel failed to ask Greer why a beep occurred prior to blank 4 second spot if he never turned off his mic, thereby proving that the altering party knew the idiosyncrasies of the L3 Mobile Vision System, but did NOT know (at time of tampering) that Greer's testimony regarding his routine would contradict the beep and blanked out spot.
10. Counsel failed to obtain witnesses, experts, analysis that could have assisted in a competent defense. Counsel failed to provide the court with police reports of the police assisted theft that occurred after Applicant was arrested.
11. Counsel refused to raise Applicant's strategy of defense even though he confirmed his agreement (to the court) to utilize this strategy. It is for this reason and this reason only that Applicant agreed to have him represent him.
12. Counsel failed to introduce Son's arrest and incarceration record, Multiple threats and text to “leave his stuff outside” as support for the state of mind of the Applicant.
13. Counsel failed to point out the fraudulent, retroactively altered “original” indictment and ask why would an indictment time-stamped almost 18 months prior to the Motion to Amend with the exact same font and phraseology, need to be “amended”?
14. Counsel failed to point out that in no way, is Applicant responsible for the bogus 911 call made by his son to 911, or 911 Operator and Police making no less than five (5) critical errors in their duties which led up to the event.

Now here are the Affidavits sent to the Court as a result of the Writ of Habeas by Gregg Gibbs and Mark Ledbetter where they claim to know nothing about the tampered evidence (then be sure to see the emails that prove that they did know Mr. Bailey had serious suspicions and they could have investigated even using experts out of state that would have been untainted by Frisco PD influence).  We will attempt to put Ledbetter's full affidavit listing every case Barry Dickey has worked on and the other Report by Herbert Joe, because we're pretty sure every case that they have worked on will need to be looked at at some point in the future.



 

 

And here's the emails proving they knew Mr. Bailey suspected such and also laid out the strategy that they were to employ with his case or he would represent himself.   Now that was the fly in the ointment,  what if Mr. Bailey represented himself and made sure that all pertinent evidence was uncovered.  I fully expected him to do so.  Why?   Because as Mr. Bailey's friend, I wrote his opening and closing statements in the nights prior to his trial and we laid out exactly what was to be presented in his defense.  I was stunned to find out he had attorney's representing him at the last moment.

 

MORE JUNK SCIENCE----MOVE OVER SAN ANTONIO 4

MORE JUNK SCIENCE (San Antonio 4, . . . move over)


By David Lightfoot Hernandez

Preface:   URGENT... IF YOU OR A LOVED ONE WERE A DEFENDANT... AND THEREFORE, POSSIBLY A VICTIM OF FALSIFIED FORENSIC EVIDENCE, WE RECOMMEND YOU CONTACT THE APPROPRIATE AUTHORITIES, AS ALL CASES INVOLVING BARRY DICKEY AND YONOVITZ AND JOE WILL ASSUREDLY NEED TO BE REPOPENED TO EXAMINE THE VALIDITY OF THEIR TESTAMENT(S).
(WE HAVE PUBLISHED ONLY A PARTIAL LIST)

More Junk Science...

In the course of human endeavors, lives evident, the evil in man's heart. When it is prudent to tell the truth, he tells the contrary. Faced with the decision to tell the truth or "sell a lie," the salesman always prevails.

When men are given power and authority, to which they can deceive, it seems as if "becomes them," to hide the truth. The innate characteristics that work contrary to the command to produce the entire truth and all the evidence favorable to the support of innocence, of one accused; . it seems as if handing over the actual evidence, means to give up the most valuable idol! Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d (1963).

In January, 2014, Governor Rick Perry signed into law "the

Michael Morton Act." Prosecutors must now live by Art. 2.01, Tex.

Code of Criminal Procedure, regularly or face serious consequences.

Unfortunately, Paul Bailey was victim of prosecutorial misconduct  prior to 2014!? Which raises the question... why only after 2014!?

How audacious, how many times audacious, can/must be disavowed?

Does justice assured start only after January 2014, in Texas?

The Trouble with Doubles...

When two experts lock horns hell usually breaks loose. In Paul

Bailey's case, one expert saw the light or .hears a gunshot...

while the other claims there is no light... does not hear a gunshot,

so to speak. The truth (according to these “experts”) is, and/or they

attest to... stands so far that there was no tampering, with the

audio evidence. But... lo and behold a third, then a fourth, and

a fifth and even a sixth bull appears with bigger horns, and all

together far better validated technology. Suddenly a real dilemma

exists! Trial counsel covers their groins, saying: "Don't kick

us Paul. We bought the best experts the indigent defense fund

could buy!"... "We didn't really know!" (That is a lie, Paul Bailey emailed them
and their assistant numerous times about the mysterious blanked out spots on the
tape!

He also raised the issue of the phone call the police had with his daughter—
it was not on the tapes either—Is that the additional 5 minute blanked out spot
that experts found?

What now!? Frisco is left, for all intents and purposes-- naked

in the cathedral.

AND, Paul Bailey has proven the length some will go to, in

order to hold fast to the truth... even if it means, being an actually innocent man, he will be sent to prison! All the while those perpetrators of evil hope his demise in the dreadful place will end their fear of exposure.

The prosecutor(s) knew of the tampering of the audio evidence (Collin County); they knew of the check for the '08 Land Cruiser was forged and constituted both corporate fraud and bank fraud (Dallas County)... yet they failed to disclose this to the defense. Brady v. Maryland, supra, was audaciously disregarded.

Move over...

So, as far as the so-called expert opinion(s) regarding the
audio evidence and bank's forensic evidence that the prosecution
was in possession of, one need not look any further than the case of the "San Antonio 4," who fortunately were exonerated (only)
after the recantment of pediatric doctor, Kellogg, when she had a change of heart following the American Academy of Pediatrics change of protocols governing exams on sexual assault victims. Hmm... "protocols."

Science is predicated upon theory, and theory is not always

fact BUT S.W.A.G. (Scientific Wild-Assed Guess) apparently can

precariously overcome the obvious to the most casual observer facts

. as the better truth, when it is not subject to scrutiny! Or so

it seems.

The City of Frisco in collusion with Collin County and Dallas

County's district attorneys, went to great lengths in an undeniable

collusive malicious prosecution. All to put away an alleged crazed

gun-totin' lunatic (as it was portrayed by media outlets like WFAA and the Dallas Morning News- who spouted Frisco Texas' Police Department's official party line--- so much for “Freedom of the Press”- what we really have is freedom to do nothing and question nothing because they are lazy press. But what and/or who is the more crazed lunatic? So many conspiring to put an innocent person in prison?! All for the sake of saving face? Who is the real lunatic(s) here?

Shame on You...

I say this to their shame That would be Frisco, Collin

County, Dallas County's shame... yet to be revealed is Bank of

America's participation in this dispicable crime but soon to be exposed!???

To what length shall man's evil expound? The limits it seems

can somehow wield the sword of injustice... or somehow... control the combination to the bank vault.

For man's heart is evil continually. His precious idol... or

god... is made out of wood, fiber, and ink, and adorns the portraits

of dead presidents.

Money, or the love thereof,... is truly "the root of all evil?"

ABSOLUTE AUTHORITY, ABSOLUTE POWER, ABSOLUTE CORRUPTION IN COLLIN AND DALLAS COUNTY COURTROOMS

By Paul Bailey

Paul Bailey has learned the hard way that there are basic rules of law practiced by State of Texas. Bailey contends it’s imperative that everyone be confident of these laws, laws that provide the foundation for which the prison system is supplied a steady flow of occupants. Laws that represent precisely why district attorneys and judges, most specifically Dallas and Collin County but includes many others in Texas should not go unopposed in election.

Such is why, excuse me, I mean how district attorneys are able to maintain their totally unqualified conviction rate, they relearned these basic rules of law early on, it took Michael Morton 25 years of illegal incarceration to realize that these rules of law shrunk any legitimate judicial process.

Bailey does however also realize that the numerous acts of judicial misconduct that he has endured far outnumber those committed in Morton's case. He also realized that those that have participated in his highly illegal, malicious prosecution may not intend to for him to spend 25 years incarcerated, they intend to for Bailey to be released as soon as possible in a wooden box. Bailey continually asserts he fears only the one that can kill the soul not the body however.

As we said in our first edition of this article, the acts of judicial misconduct in the Michael Morton case paled in comparison to Bailey's case. The parties involved in the egregious acts of malicious prosecution range from multiple levels of the judiciary from local, county, state and even federal officials. The blatant violations of law in order to cover up malfeasance, dereliction of duty and police misalaniouism requires the best of the best of the most corrupt. Perhaps some participants may have thus far been reluctant participants, Bailey suspects Judge Ray Wheless is one. However Judge Teresa Hawthorne offered unfettered, pompous disregard for proper judicial procedure alliance quite willingly as is the Dallas DA and certainly his court appointed pretender J.R Crook (I mean JR Cook).

Which brings us to yet another violation/disregard for the proper judicial process and/or application of law. Cook’s participation revealed in his disregard for the properly filed, filing of a quash motion, J.R. Cook not only refused to file he left Bailey to argue the motion to the illegal indictment and Hawthorne allowed the DA to side step this quash and illegally charge me for a debt discharged in bankruptcy.

Had Cook had any regard whatsoever of properly defending Bailey, just let it be dismissed now. Even after prompting by Bailey’s daughter and numerous text messages and phone calls ending in a faux pas by Cook, deliberate faux pas we must add that ended in Bailey’s conviction.

So along with the obviously properly dismissed as civil dispute investigation by Detective Cox of the Dallas Police FBI Cyber Squad we shall include the disregard/ineffective council and by the way Judge Hawthorne, J.R. Cook was Bailey’s court appointed attorney at the time of the quashed motion contrary to your pompous remarks to my friend (her initials are DM and yes she prepared an affidavit of her mistreatment by JR Cook and Judge Teresa Hawthorne the day she went down to obtain a copy of the transcripts for me.

There are so many other illegal or illegalities such as allowing a postdated foreign power of attorney/affidavit to be submitted in the court by the so called victim and we haven’t touched on filing federal bankruptcy law by going so far as to include the quash as part of Bailey’s Writ of Habeas. Moreover, the malicious prosecution is obvious.

TO BE CONTINUED....

MISCONDUCT IN MICHAEL MORTON CASE PALES IN COMPARISON TO THE KANGAROO COURTS OF COLLIN AND DALLAS COUNTIES

By Paul Bailey

Although Collin County’s prosecution/cover up of the City of Frisco’s malfeasance shall ultimately be revealed as the latest case of how law enforcement alters/falsifies evidence (in collusion with judicial, prosecutor, and dare I say Defense attorney misconduct) in order to obtain a conviction from the cohorts in corruption we’re trying to address.

Collin County's and Dallas County's prosecution of Paul Bailey is the winner of the award for “most aggrievous act of malicious prosecution” by a judiciary.

The premeditated, collusive act that ultimately provided Dallas County DA his own trophy may even shock you. Only after many hours of reviewing the past evidence and legal precedent was the conclusion arrived at that the appeal needs to be that of malicious prosecution/actual evidence, actual innocence. There is simply so many grounds to overwhelm, to overturn the conviction; the only way to describe them is convoluted. There are so many numerous illegalities, there’s evidence of multiple improprieties, curious interpretation of law and acts judicial misconduct no other premise may be deemed appropriate.

These aggregious acts are believed, that the case will set yet another standard in obstruction of justice and judicial impropriety.

A premeditated collusion of various law enforcement, court officials and/or attorney is fundamentally obvious. In fact too numerous are the infractions of obvious power that a priority alignment of the declaration has not yet been assigned.

Although not yet confirmed will be the fact that a proper investigation by Detective Cox of the FBI, Dallas Cyber Squad had assigned and published its prosecution report dismissing the matter properly as a civil matter, civil matter in quotation, in 2009. Certainly since the prosecution and the court appointed PI lied (on the record) by the way, they said that Detective Cox had retired and they had no way of knowing where he was or how to contact him at the time of trial. Imagine not being able to find an FBI agent. Detective Cox was and remains a employed to this day by Dallas PD and the FBI right here in Dallas. It is obvious that Detective Cox wanted nothing to do with the Collin/Dallas County DA’s highly illegal ruse and he refused to go along with the outrageous perjury/judicial misconduct, (I digress, friends there remains someone in law enforcement who has a properly aligned moral compass).

But then again so is the attorney Jim Baumgartner, who represented me in bankruptcy, then died unexpectedly just a couple of days before my trial. There of course was another one that was then unable to respond to a subpoena (like Officer Debra Stansell whose untimely death made her unavailable for my Collin County Trial), especially bad since he would have testified to his instructing me (Bailey) to sell the vehicles in question in a liquidation of corporate asset. His death was devastating to his family and to me, Paul Bailey.

There are many of other improprieties and illegalities and certainly unusual circumstances that should be placed first like the liquidation and/or act itself. That followed a four month disappearance act of the so-called victim. Bailey’s office manager at the time, Christina Rynearson since her health had taken a sudden turn for the worse and made her unable to answer her subpoena. Judge Hawthorne wouldn’t let her affidavit be admitted as evidence although it was notarized and has been used in a previous court hearing. She was prepared to testify by phone but that wasn’t allowed either.

Everything Bailey attempted to submit as evidence was denied by Judge Hawthorne and even the evidence that the Dallas prosecution provided is highly suspect. Take a look at the Detective Cox report, imagine that a prosecution can simply black out sections that are providing the defense as evidence and get away with it. The bottom line is that the Dallas DA, District Collins DA simply swooped in and stole Superman’s cape as they flew around the court room unchecked, allowed to have all of Bailey’s objections overruled. The ever pompous Judge Hawthorne was ever present, kangaroo court?? Kangaroo court??

At this point we’re unable to show the official court record as all requests were denied without written order thus far. Judge Teresa Hawthorne denied every legal remedy requested by Paul Bailey.

Maybe we’ll start with the fact that an unopposed hearing of bankruptcy is that denied a legitimate adjoinment by Federal Court that was attended by Dallas County’s lead prosecutor but Bailey was not and which facilitated a erroneous ruling by that Judge. The motion to adjoin by the next defiant federal bankruptcy judge, anyway you start to get the convoluted part.

WHY THE COLLIN COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY GREG WILLIS SHOULD NOT GO UNOPPOSED!

By Paul Bailey

The recent filing (of a Writ of Habeas Corpus regarding my illegal incarceration which proves evidence tampering) in Collin County of this pro se' defendant (pro se' means without an attorney- I now no longer trust them), Frisco Paul (that's me) provides proof that there’s no regard for the wrongfully accused and/or those who are actually innocent of charges as filed by the Collin County District Attorney Greg Willis (now up for reelection!).

The recent Michael Morton Act (named after the man who spent 25 years in prison and then DNA evidence proved his innocence) signed into law by Governor Rick Perry. The recent article by Randall Sims in the Prosecutor states that it “ushers in a new era in discovery for Texas prosecutors”. Each prosecutor is charged under Texas Code of Criminal Procedure art. 2.01 “not to convict, but to see that justice is done.” Unfortunately the law is not retroactive, is became effective January 1, 2014. By the way, the prosecutor that caused the investigation to be stopped prematurely only spent 10 days in jail himself!

Exculpatory evidence (that is evidence favorable to the defendant, also known as “Brady” evidence) has long been held to be required to be provided to defendants prior to trial. (We've already shown letters asking for this evidence (it was also requested by my “attorneys” prior to trial in boilerplate terminology, but of course, none of the attorneys actually sat down to figure out exactly what was NOT provided by prosecutors by listening to ME and my account of what went on that evening. And that they intentionally neglected the obvious. My friend, has done just that and the list is extensive. Not only that, but she also listened to the audio and was able to tell that something wasn't right about the “blank spots” (we have several posts on that) and so she set about finding experts who could explain what had happened. Several experts all agreed that evidence had been clearly tampered with and one expert who was formerly running for US Congress went so far as to state that “evidence was criminally altered”. By denying me exculpatory evidence, the Collin County DA, my own Public Pretenders Greg Gibbs and Mark Ledbetter, and now Judge Ray Wheless have deprived an innocent man his civil liberties and freedom. I am absolutely certain that all of this was brought about so that Frisco Texas Police Department could try to avoid Civil Liability for their mistakes and now their evidence tampering. One thing's for sure, they know that once you're in prison, it's not easy to get out, even if you've proven your innocence!

The recent Writ of Habeas filed in Collin County proves my innocence, along with evidence tampering, and requests a new trial, however, this motion would have been filed as an actual innocence filing had communications not been illegally interrupted for 90 days and my legal correspondence been hindered by TDCJ (Texas Department of Criminal Justice- actually that's a misnomer- It's really the Texas Department of Criminal INJUSTICE- (we will begin publishing the long list of complaints of illegal treatment and Civil Rights Violations actually committed by the TDCJ Officials- under the guidance of Warden Glen Whitfield very soon). How did TDCJ accomplish this? By filing a bogus disciplinary charge (my ID was stolen) and disrupting all commmuncations (including telephone privileges and interfered with multiple mail and incoming jpay communications.) The last bit of scientific forensic evidence proving my innocence (they were able to retrieve my warning to my son from the car audio-this was the part that had been erased from the lapel mic) had not been bought to my attention due to the interruption of both telephone and postal correspondence.

TDCJ has the ability to monitor all telephone and mail correspondence providing the so called Department of Justice and it’s cohorts in the judicial country club of corruption such liberties. If TDCJ decides you might actually be innocent they can have you thrown in the psych ward (as they did in Plainview) and separate you from your legal documents (they did this for over 8 weeks-when I got my papers back several grievance receipts had been stolen).

Formal complaints to the grievance committee PDC and the US Postmaster Inspector General Complaints and I was denied proper legal remedy.

Consequently the writ was filed as a motion for new trial, however that is only the beginning of the continuing injustice that I suffer at the hands of Collin County DA and Judge Wheless as they have since chosen to deny irrefutable evidence of actual innocence by filing a court action that demands the court to postpone justice just because they can. This in their action that says they have a designation of issues, regardless of the undisputable scientifically documented facts that prove evidence was altered (tampered) (and prove that I could not have committed the crime) that led to my being charged with assault with a deadly weapon. Now we have indisputable facts that prove the Frisco Police Department fabricated evidence illegally in order to apply a warrant and then subsequently illegally arrested me and framed me by the Frisco Police Department, Collin County DA and this court appointed attorneys Greg Gibbs and Mark Ledbetter and others I remain incarcerated as actual innocent man.

and then re-file a new one as absolute innocent shortly for a motion that might allow me to force their hand in order to identify the actual innocence claim which is what we have been discussing.

And it deserves a motion that will force them to identify an actual innocence claim that since I did not know of the last bit of evidence that my associate had obtained. How did they know that my communications would or how did they get it first? Do you suppose that my associate's phone is tapped illegally? How else could they have known and accomplished this feat so fast?

The claim that the charge that I was given was in my ID and was in my telephone privileges, answered within 24 hours, how convenient just before an election. This is why the DA and judges should not go unopposed.

Okay, that’s it, that’s what I wrote.

[END OF TRANSCRIPT 00:05:53]

PAUL BAILEY'S OBJECTION TO COURT APPOINTED PRETENDERS GREG GIBBS AND MARK LEDBETTER'S AFFIDAVITS TO THE COURT TO RESPOND TO HIS CHARGES

If you've been following the blog of Paul Bailey, you may know that the Writ of Habeas filed in March listed 15 or so ways that the Court Appointed Pretenders (the So-Called Attorneys Gregg Gibbs and Mark Ledbetter) failed in defending their client.   They outline numerous reasons why the judgement should be overturned (based on his innocence) or should receive a new trial (15 reasons just for their sabotage and collusion with Collin County District Attorneys and the Frisco Police Department).    That does not include a multitude of other reasons (evidence tampering and perjury being one  of the most egregious reasons that the verdict should be overturned and his innocence declared).

Here is Mr. Bailey's latest motion regarding his Objection to the Court of allowing the Court Appointed Pretenders Affidavits to answer the charges against them.    The best they can hope for is to be found incompetent.   But we really don't believe that they were truly that stupid, we are positive that their sabotage was egregious, collusionary, intentional, and meant to do harm to Mr. Bailey.  

Here's something to think about.   Innocent people whose attorney's won't listen to them, won't do their jobs, and won't investigate anything usually have clients that are furious that their story isn't being told.   If you were in the true victim's (Mr. Bailey's) shoes, you'd be adamant that the deck was stacked against you.    Attorneys have an ethical requirement to make sure their client's get a fair trial.    Mr. Bailey wasn't given that.   There were multiple opportunities for them to investigate and question evidence and demand evidence never provided by the Frisco Police Department.     Mr. Bailey wants the true offenders of justice to have to face him in court.  Make no mistake this won't be the last of their troubles.   They may be looking for new careers before all is said and done.

On another note, we've received information recently that the Texas Rangers have at least 5 ongoing investigations into other malfeasance at the Frisco Police Department-- we can only hope that they look into the mysterious "suicide" of Detective Debra Stansell.  Everyone that knew her that we've talked to knew she was straight as an arrow.

We do find it interesting to note that nearly every legal mailing either to or from the prison has been tampered with.   This document was meant to be a copy for his files because Mr. Bailey sent the original directly to the court for filing.  This was sent on May 21 and was just received May 29th.   The copy sent directly to the court on the same day  is not on the docket, so he has requested that this document be filed along with signature pages he has provided previously,  that is why you will see the attached signature page at the end.  If you or someone you know has uncovered vast amounts of illegalities in and around the prison system, the Police Department, Malfeasance by the Public Pretenders, the District Attorneys, or the judiciary--we now recommend providing cover sheets to each mailing describing each document and the number of pages in each.  We also recommend putting a unique mark in a unique color on each page so that pages cannot be tampered with.  We will cover more about that issue in another post.

Stay Tuned-  We will be posting more soon.

ATTORNEYS GREG GIBBS AND MARK LEDBETTER SABOTAGED CLIENT AND COLLUDED WITH FRISCO POLICE DEPARTMENT WHO TAMPERED WITH EVIDENCE.  DID THE COLLIN COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY KNOW ABOUT THE TAMPERED EVIDENCE?  THEY'D HAVE TO BE AWARE OF IT.   READ THE WRIT OF HABEAS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TO FIND OUT WHY WE BELIEVE THEY WERE ALSO GUILTY OF COLLUSION AND SABOTAGE.    ALSO READ MORE ABOUT DETECTIVE DEBRA STANSELL'S SUSPICIOUS "SUICIDE".