there
is no way that Mr. Bailey had “intent” to harm anyone, if he
couldn't see them,
that
Castle Law gives him the right to protect himself and his property
(especially considering the circumstances, and
he
also failed to point out that Greer committed perjury on the stand.
How?
By not syncing the
two audio files from the “Certified Video” and point out that
after the 4 second blank spot on Greer's lapel mic, at 23:28:53 the
audio comes back on but no gunshot is heard. In the car video (over
120 feet away), the gunshot is heard at 23:28:54. If both videos are
time synced the gun shot should be heard on the lapel mic. IT
IS NOT HEARD BECAUSE GREER WAS NOWHERE CLOSE TO THE DOOR (meaning he
perjured himself) or
it would have been recorded. The part that was tampered with and
removed from the audio, was Mr Bailey's warning to his son, Rick,
because it proved that he acted in accordance with Castle Law in
Texas.
Now
it is interesting to note that only recently did we discover that I
was still in possession of texts forwarded for me around 2 years ago
from Mr. Bailey that the Original Court Appointed “Authenticator”
had sent via email to Mr. Bailey's Court Appointed Attorney at the
time (Raphael DeLagarza) which were then sent to Mr. Bailey who then
forwarded them on to me. I had no idea they were important until
recently, but once I knew that they were important, I promptly
snapped screenshots and uploaded them to the web for posterity. Take
a look and see how their initial opinion of tampered evidence
abruptly changed. For what reason, I don't know, but I do know that
additional experts disagree with
his final “opinion” that nothing was wrong with the tapes.
21.
These are just some of the issues that really disturb me about this
specific case:
a)
“Defense” wouldn't show Mr Bailey's recreated video which could
have shown the jury somecontext. They also might have seen that he
lives in a beautiful home and just might not be seen as much of a
threat.
b) Why
was the question that Officer Stansell asked Mr Bailey not shown in
any notes or tapes? She asked him "Mr Bailey, who did you think
was at the door? Did you believe it was your son?" Were
they, by this time, in so deep that they had to make the evidence
allowed in court, fit the story by police who fell for a setup by a
drug addict who wanted his father out of his way so he could rob
him?
c)
Why is the fact that Rick is now in prison for the very crime Mr
Bailey sought to prevent, not in evidence?
d)
Why was Rick allowed to mill around and take the items that he
needed to commit those crimes (wallet etc), while the police were
still at Mr Bailey's house (after his arrest) and why was the jury
not notified of it?
e)
Why would “Defense” Attorney Gibbs not recuse himself since
there was an obvious conflict of interest since he claimed he was
Stansell's husband's “good friend” and that (his words) she was
a real bit**? What about the lack of any sort
of defense? What about him lying to the court and to his client that
he would present Mr. Bailey's defense?
f)
Why was a nearly 60 year old man with obvious health problems (two
subsequent heart attacks after the arrest ordeal) held under the
Patriot Act without counsel for several hours?
g)
Why would Mr. Bailey's son Rick not be allowed to testify as to what
happened that evening?
h)
Since Castle law gives Mr Bailey the right to protect his property
(remember police clearly did not follow protocol meaning there was
no way Mr. Bailey could know it was police banging on his door
instead of his son and rustling through his bushes in the middle of
the night), “Defense” Attorney Gibbs had to make sure no defense
occurred for Mr Bailey. I
can come to no other conclusion than, this man's collusion,
complacency, incompetence, fear of the Collin County “system” or
laziness put Mr Bailey in jail.
i)Why
did the Court Appointed Authenticator's initial reports vary so
dramatically from the final report and why was there no spectral
analysis done?
To
tell you his story gets even worse, would be an understatement.
22.
Mr Bailey's problems GOT MUCH WORSE after he fired up his blog
(at www.friscopaul.blogspot.com)
telling his side of the story in Collin County. Once he does this, lo
and behold, he is arrested for an issue previously declared a “civil
matter” by a Detective in Dallas and which had subsequently been discharged in
bankruptcy. Bear in mind, this matter was for vehicles purchased by
people supposedly living in Africa, who, instead of accepting
shipment for vehicles immediately (as is the norm) they
went months without
answering phone calls or emails. As attested by affidavit of the
Business Manager and Bookkeeper at the time.
Another
email that should have been used is from Detective Cox, himself. View
the email between him and Mr. Bailey's bankruptcy attorney stating it
was a civil matter. In
addition, the letter from the plaintiff's attorney advising his
clients that he was withdrawing from representing them due to
non-cooperation and that once Mr. Bailey files bankruptcy, that he
could not help them, further points, once again, to a civil matter I
have called Detective Cox numerous times since November 2012, but he
does not return my calls. I wanted to inform him that when Mr. Bailey
wanted to subpeona him to testify the DA and his court appointed
attorney and investigator told him he had long since retired).
Unbeknownst to them, I had called his voice mail in November 2012 and
the message on his voicemail at that time indicated that he was on
vacation. So I immediately knew something was amiss when Mr. Bailey
told me that they said Det Cox was unavailable for subpeona.
In
the Dallas case, the issue of cars being sold in preparation for
liquidation since the buyers had not arranged for receipt of cars
left for months nor had they responded to emails or phone calls
telling them they should do so (Mr. Bailey was not sure they were
even alive as they were from Angola) was discharged in bankruptcy, so
apparently the court did not have jurisdiction, but that didn't keep
them from allowing a faulty indictment from being amended (despite a
quash motion being filed), then right before the jury deliberated,
prosecutors advised jury that they were to ignore first indictment as
it was being “thrown out” (thereby acquitting him of it), and
telling jury to deliberate on the second indictment (based on same
faulty evidence)- thereby effectively committing double jeopardy in
same trial!
23.
Just recently, the Dallas Judge Teresa Hawthorne sent him a letter
titled “Order Designating Issues” that said Attorney April E
Smith is to be a fact-finder for the court after
Mr. Bailey filed a writ of Habeas Corpus and a Rule to Show Cause
requesting transcripts and evidence for the trial) and
it specifically says that she is NOT to
represent Mr. Bailey. This document IS NOT on the DOCKET. Upon
closer inspection, we also note that the Judge's Order Designating
Issues, has a stamp on the back that was “witnessed” the day
PRIOR to the Judge ordering such on the 26th.
Interestingly,
the Docket shows ANOTHER order signed within one day of the previous
“Order Designating Issues”, appointing the
same attorney to
be his court appointed attorney. (Mr.
Bailey was never sent a copy of this order, so unless someone pulled
up the docket, he would not even know about it). Because the same
attorney was assigned to two different roles, this amounts to a
“Court Ordered Conflict of Interest”.
April
E Smith knows about this conflict of interest since she has made no
contact with Mr. Bailey even after he wrote her a letter making her
aware that he knew about her appointment and asking for her to
contact him. However,
he believes this is just another attempt to stall justice and keep
him incarcerated.
Documents
and discussion are here
Furthermore,
while attempting to obtain court records for him, now that he's
indigent, Judge Hawthorne was terribly abusive when a friend went to
the courthouse (at the request of his previous court-appointed
attorney to meet him there and he'd help her get the transcripts Mr.
Bailey needed since he claimed he had nothing in his files on Mr.
Bailey's case) where Judge Hawthorne accused this individual of
"practicing law without a license". This
was apparently for the "crime" of attempting to obtain
court transcripts so that Mr. Bailey could have the case either
appealed or overturned. Records that we are now told are supposed to
be automatically provided to him as a pro se defendant. Judge Teresa
Hawthorne has
denied Mr. Bailey the transcripts for his case, even though she knows
full well that he is indigent as her subsequent orders confirm by
appointing him another court-appointed attorney (albeit with a
conflict of interest as covered above). What is in those transcripts
that she doesn't want him to know? We think we know, he appeared
before the Judge and advised her that he needed to attend a
previously scheduled Hearing for New Trial in Collin County. She said
“Mr. Bailey, you're going nowhere!”.
24.
In late November, Mr. Bailey filed a Writ of Mandamas which compels the
Judge to rule on the Writ of Habeas and the Rule to Show Cause (ie:
cough up the legally guaranteed transcripts that he is due) that he
filed motions for months ago. Now today, he receives a letter whose envelope is dated
December 2nd,
with documents that demand his response within 20 days or so, but
which are backdated to September! (ONCE AGAIN, THESE DOCUMENTS ARE NOT ON THE
DOCKET). See the latest photo as of today, the Miscellaneous
Correspondance listed at the top is the Writ of Mandamas just filed.
Note that nothing was placed on the docket between June 25 and
November 26. As I've told him, this is the gang that can't shoot
straight!
As
a result of several documents being removed from the mail from Mr.
Bailey to me to take care of things for him on his behalf, I had him
institute a policy of logging every document enclosed in the
envelope and the date of mailing as well as telling me what he is
sending and when so that I can be on the lookout for the documents.
This
is the text of the letter that Mr. Bailey be requested typed up and
sent to him for his signature. The Texas Information Act is
basically an open records act. However, Frisco has previously denied
a request for similar information, claiming that because he is
incarcerated, they don't have to comply. Now bear in mind, Mr.
Bailey is acting as his own attorney, so this clause that they are
hiding behind should not apply. And it definitely didn't apply when
the Attorney General told them to release all the evidence to Mr.
Bailey and his then, court-appointed attorneys!
Dear
Public Information Officer:
Pursuant
to Section 552.221 of the Government Code of Texas, I
respectfully request a certified copy of the following. Since
I am Pro Se, I am acting as attorney for myself so I am not subject
to the exemption 552.028.
Certified
Copies from the original recordings uploaded (and
certification from Company or Municipality storing or servicing the
recordings provided do not differ from the recordings stored) of all
911
calls or any other calls made with (both to and from) Paul
Clarence Bailey or about Paul Clarence Bailey on 6/28/2009 to
present day,
lapel
and car mics and video on every officer, employee, contractor that
has ever been at the scene at any time from 6/28/2009 to
present day.
Recordings
of “Hostage Negotiator” calls made with me, Paul Bailey, or
about Paul Bailey on or since 6/28/2009.
A
list of every officer, employee, or contractor on the scene at the
time on or since 6/28/2009.
A
list of every municipality or any other law enforcement agency or
contractor involved at the scene at 6515 Winston Drive, Frisco, TX
75035 on or since 6/28/2009.
A
list of the names of female Police Officers working/assigned and on
duty at the Frisco Police Department on June 6, 2011 and June 13,
2011.
A
list individuals and their positions (whether employee or
contractor), who have had, are, or have ever been authorized to
access or make changes to the data in the Flashback system on or
since 6/28/2009.
I
respectfully request, due to the fact that am indigent, that fees be
waived. If you choose not to waive fees and the cost of copying
exceeds $25, would you please tell me the actual costs before making
the copies? Thank you. Please contact me via mail if there are any
questions. Thank you for your attention to this request.
Sincerely,
Paul Bailey
All
along the way, Mr. Bailey has experienced multiple civil rights
violations including the following:
1. withholding medical care and tampering with medications
withholding
or tampering with communications,
being
sent to the Psych facility as retailiation for filing grievances,
denial
of medical records,
moving
to various facilities,
denial
of deposits to inmate's trust fund,
taking
his legal documents, clothing, blood pressure medication, glasses,
and dental appliances from him (a total of 8 weeks at a single
time).
Denial
of access to law library.
Being
charged for postage to return Jailhouse Lawyers Manual chapters
written by prominent civil rights attorneys when item was never
returned to sender (fraudulent).
Threatened
with retaliation (by getting a “case” which would affect
parole) for not taking a flu shot (when he is already immune
compromised).
Excessive
charges for “medical care deductibles”.
Tampering
with medical records retroactively.
Theft
of several grievance receipts contained in the documents taken for
the 8 week period.
Theft
of documents needed for 2nd level
grievances with TDCJ.
Theft
of legal mail requiring Mr. Bailey's signature requesting
documents/evidence previously withheld from him Frisco Police
Department.
Most
recently, Mr. Bailey was punished by refusing to sign a BLANK
DOCUMENT. (THIS IS AFTER HE HAS ALREADY DISCOVERED AND INCLUDED
PROOF THAT HIS MEDICAL RECORDS HAVE BEEN TAMPERED WITH).
2nd Amendment Rights, Castle Law, Collin County,Collin County District Attorney, Evidence Tampering, Frisco Texas Police Department, Lindsey Byers Assistant District Attorney Collin County Texas, Greg Willis Collin County District Attorney, Malicious Prosecution, altered evidence, tampering with government records, Right to Bear Arms, Castle Law, Collin County Assistant District Attorney John Schomberger, False Arrest, Police Corruption and Abuse, Militant Militarized Police Force, Police-Assisted Theft in Collin County, Conspiracies and the Law, RICO, Color of Law, Civil Rights Abuses by Police,
