DALLAS JUDGE TERESA HAWTHORNE BACKDATES DOCUMENTS

After Paul Bailey's Writ of Habeas was ignored by Teresa Hawthorne for Months (the writ never made it on the docket, by the way), Mr Bailey filed a Writ of Mandamus (that one never made it on the docket either! He then in quick succession received a document in early December and witnessed as well, which was BACKDATED to September 2013!  (some of the documents below are scrollable!).

He also received two postcards saying the Court of Criminal Appeals has his document and it was dismissed. We are now trying to ascertain what the problem was because the lady in Dallas went over it with a fine tooth comb. If you scroll through it, you'll note there are a couple of extra blank pages, but it's all there- so we have no idea why it was dismissed. But he's still working and will reveal as much as he can about this corruption.

He then in quick succession received a document in early December and witnessed as well, which was BACKDATED to September 2013!

2nd Amendment Rights, Right to Bear Arms, Self-Defense, Castle Law, Collin County,Collin County District Attorney, Evidence Tampering, Frisco Texas Police Department, Lindsey Byers Assistant District Attorney Collin County Texas, Greg Willis Collin County District Attorney, Malicious Prosecution, altered evidence, tampering with government records, Right to Bear Arms, Castle Law, Collin County Assistant District Attorney John Schomberger, False Arrest, Police Corruption and Abuse, Militant Militarized Police Force, Police-Assisted Theft in Collin County, Conspiracies and the Law, RICO, Color of Law, Civil Rights Abuses by Police, Police abuse

More Crazy Stuff from Judge Teresa Hawthorne's Court

We may not speak "lawyerese", but we can tell if something isn't right or ethical.

Notice the stamp that is on the back of the Order Designating Issues.    Look below at the stamp and the "Order".   There are multiple things we are concerned with when we look at these documents.

1)  Is it customary for a document to be "Witnessed" the day PRIOR to it being ordered by the Judge?  Scroll down and note the date the order was signed by the Judge.   This stamp appears on the back of the "Order designating Issues".

2)  When you combine the fact that the SAME attorney (was appointed by the Judge to do this function, when the day PRIOR she was appointed to represent Paul Bailey- how do you account for that?

3)  The appointment of this attorney, is on the docket (see below), but was NEVER SENT TO PAUL BAILEY AND THE ATTORNEY, APRIL E. SMITH,  HAS STILL NOT RESPONDED TO HIS REQUEST FOR CONTACT- we are attaching the image of the certified mail return receipt below.    How was he supposed to know that he had an attorney appointed without a letter from the court unless a friend or family member happened to see the docket.  Remember, he had no attorney that was monitoring his case.

4)   This "Order Designating Issues" (for the court) was sent to Paul Bailey in prison, BUT IT IS NOT ON THE DOCKET.

You can see for yourself by clicking here and typing in F1200810 if you'd like to see the latest interactive version of the docket.  We've preserved the images above and below of the dockets for posterity and evidence as future needs may dictate a history.

Under the old case, this is what you see.

Just another in a long list of crudely hilarious missteps by the "court".  Apparently, these lawyer types think no one will know the difference.

We think Judge Hawthorne has higher ambitions after looking at some of her opinions, and the fact that she calls herself a "Democrat" and in a Red state doesn't have much competition in primaries.   Democrats are supposed to believe in equality and fairness for all people,  even poor people.  Trust me, I don't want her type representing me on anything.   We hope someone runs against her next year.  We plan on providing all these documents to her opposition.

What was Judge Teresa Hawthorne of the 203rd Judicial District Court thinking?

Take a look at both of these documents.  They appoint the exact same Attorney April Smith in each document.  Take note of the duties that attorney April Smith is to perform.  Also note that these documents were signed within ONE DAY of each other by Judge Teresa Hawthorne.   How could she not remember a document she signed previously and not realize she just ordered an Attorney to do a job with an obvious conflict of interest?   By the way, Mr Bailey has had no contact from his new attorney.   Wonder why?  He believes this is to stall him from having this whole episode overturned.

Also note that the appointment of counsel for indigent defendant was posted on the court's website.   But the order designating issues was NOT posted on the website but WAS sent to Mr. Bailey.  How does this type of thing occur?  The final image is the stamped back of the order showing it was stamped by the court.

How can the same person represent him while remaining independent and preparing findings of fact and conclusions of law for the court?

Dallas Case : COURT ORDERED CONFLICT OF INTEREST?

Dallas Appointment Of Counsel


Dallas states response to habeas


Dallas Write


Exhibit 11 Motion for Discovery


Note in file for JR Cook001


Rule to show cause