THE MURDERS JUST HAVEN'T BEEN REPORTED YET- PAUL BAILEY SUSPECTS FOUL PLAY IN SUSPICIOUS DEATHS

The following article was written by Paul Bailey and transcribed from his recorded statements.

Was my Bankruptcy Attorney murdered just like Detective Debra Stansell?  We will let you decide by letting our readers examine the documents following this article.

As one of the great jailhouse lawyers of all time, David Hernandez at the Lynaugh Unit said to me when quoting ex parte Taylor, 36 S.W. 3rd 88387; the Texas Criminal Appeals 2001 quotes "The state of Texas has only one indivisible interests in a criminal prosecution: To see that the justice is done."

“I almost puked," Hernandez said. Nothing can be said that is more audacious than an ex parte Taylor, nor embodies a greater oxymoron. I shall endeavor to say that my incessant insinuation that the influential judiciary and law enforcement may meet with some sense of demise is not so audacious. Consider, if you will, the suspicious circumstances that surround the death of Frisco P.D.'s Detective Debra Stancil and one attorney now deceased, Jim Baumgartner; both key and the defense prosecution of Paul Bailey of Frisco, Texas.

A defense that has met with every conceivable malfeasance, judicial illegality and misconduct that stands to reveal the cover up of the most egregious, law enforcement involvement, collusive act of dereliction vigilantism. The now disturbing likelihood that my Attorney and friend as he was good at both, Baumgartner met with the same fate as Detective Debra Stansell of Frisco P.D. is , as I've said, 'disturbing'. I shall never forget the frightful alarm in my daughter, Kimberly's voice, when she informed me that like Debra Stansell, Jim had died an untimely death which would hurt my defense.

The subpoena that I had requested only a week earlier had yet to be served. With only a day or two before my trial I had solicited my daughter to contact Jim herself because my court appointed investigator said he could not contact him or serve him. My daughter’s words: "Dad! Jim died yesterday! Oh my God. Nobody seems to know what happened! He just died! What's going on here? First Debra Stansell, now Jim Baumgartner?"

Jim Baumgartner's testimony in my trial would- I said 'would'- that there be no misunderstanding; I did not say "should" or "could", I said "would"- have ended the highly illegal prosecution of aggravated theft and I would have been freed on bond soon thereafter. Free to pursue my appeal for the now proven actual innocent charge in Collin County. You remember the one which he inevitably revealed Frisco P.D.'s multiple acts of malfeasance, vigilantism and tampering with evidence. Oh, yeah. Agreeing to continue exposing the aforementioned criminal acts on this blog properly, this post is but a taste of what is yet to come as the Dallas County's illegal prosecution will be rightly be exposed regardless of the audacious.

I just had to let the world know to be paying attention for soon all will see that Jim's untimely death, like Debra Stansell's, deserves a proper review. As to Judge Willis, Rhodes and Detective Cox- all of which hold positions of power- in wielding true justice in my behalf and exposing many corrupt law enforcement and judiciary officials. They may want to watch their backs.

Check the shadows and be Cognizant of whatever they eat or drink. Oh, yeah, one more thing. Keep it on the QT with their spouses. I really don't want to write anymore audacious circumstance articles. I have to write an article or two about all the mail interruptions or how such preventive- proper, or awful, or timely- legal instruments, objections from being filed. You know the kind I mean. The ones that would overtake justice, "exposing the corruption that is covering up corruption".

Like the last objection that has yet to be received and filed, that will bring light to Texas' Court appointing the fox to watch the hen house that Collin County may be available at the time of this post. Or in the case of Judge Rhodes who will have a renewed opportunity to make a just ruling and join/vacate the illegal and/or void judgment of the Dallas Case. I certainly hope she's around to do so. The Dallas D.A. probably thinks I'm barking up the wrong tree, but that's alright. They have underestimated me before.

Funny how the Lord works. Evil intentions and lets evil dig its own grave. When lies cause lies sometimes the new lies pick up new ones, too. Soon all will know what I mean. Just hoping that nothing more audacious happens. Have a blessed day.

ATTORNEY APRIL E SMITH, ATTORNEY J.R. COOK, JUDGE TERESA HAWTHORNE, TEXAS COUNTRY CLUB OF JUDICIAL CORRUPTION, JUDGE RHODES, MALICIOUS PROSECUTION, DOUBLE JEOPARDY IN TEXAS COURTROOM, JUDGE TERESA HAWTHORNE'S COURT ORDERED CONFLICT OF INTEREST, JUDGE TERESA HAWTHORNE MANIPULATES THE DOCKET, POLICE CORRUPTION AND ABUSE

WHY THE DALLAS CASE WAS BOGUS AND CHARGED PAUL BAILEY ILLEGALLY

This is a page from the Enjoin Motion filed which points out the law which shows very clearly why Paul Bailey was illegally tried.   The entire case was one to assist Collin County to get Paul Bailey away from his blog and create havoc for him so he couldn't fight the Collin County coverup/crimes.   In addition, the Judge Bench warranted him months before his trial in Dallas INTENTIONALLY so he could not attend his hearing for new trial.

Paul believes God is in control since he now has proof that the Evidence in Collin County was tampered with.

At any rate, here's the page that talks about why you can't be charged with theft after you file bankruptcy (this is after the car buyers never answered phone calls or emails for months to accept delivery of the cars).   

LEGAL MAIL IS BEING STOLEN APPARENTLY THE POWERS THAT BE ARE GETTING NERVOUS AND ARE COLLUDING WITH TDCJ PRISON OFFICIALS

Just a quick update to let his readers know that  Mr. Bailey's Pro-Se Legal Mail is being stolen at the Lynaugh Prison in El Paso.  Although this is nothing new, we've just now had the time to blog about it.   One of the first times this occurred, they threw him in the psych ward naked so they could separate him from his legal documents for a lengthy period of time so they could steal several documents and rifle through the rest to see if they could figure out his legal strategies.   We are told that this is a common strategy so if you have a loved one that is acting as their own attorney (pro-se), be aware of this,  especially if they are innocenct and exposing vast injustice, crimes, or the like-- of people who like to think of themselves as powerful and exempt from the rule of law!

One of the most hilarious examples  was a Manual written by prominent Civil Rights Attorneys was sent to Mr. Bailey.   They took it, said they were charging him around $9 to return it (it never arrived and that constitutes fraud), then they provided him a form listing the reason for not allowing him to have it and it was because it had a legal glossary!   A LEGAL GLOSSARY IS CONSIDERED CONTRABAND?   What a bunch of illiterate YAY-HOOS they must have running the place!   Just the type of sycophants the political crowd like to have doing their dirty deeds, not smart enough to know they are going down when everything is rolled out, but smart enough to follow directions to harass people like Mr. Bailey.     I've frequently called them the gang that can't shoot straight and it seems the more they screw with Mr. Bailey, the more laws and civil rights they break or violate!  Of course, we fully expect them to sing like canaries with things hit the fan and it's time to nail the guys calling the shots.

We've mentioned in the past that his legal mail has been withheld for long periods of time, documents removed from mailings, etc.   We even devised a system whereby we inventoried each document included on the outside of the envelope so we could tell if anything was missing.   At that point, prison officials began destroying the envelopes that were sent to Mr. Bailey so he could not see the inventory!.

The latest strategy that Mr. Bailey has discovered is that they take out documents, copy other documents and include duplicates of those documents in the stack so that he thought we just included extra copies of some documents.

We've now had to resort to scanning, logging, and documenting each document and tracking them with a cover page indicating the document and the number of pages to each document.

2nd Amendment Rights, Civil Rights Abuses in Texas Prisons, Legal Documents Stolen by TDCJ Prison Officials, Right to Bear Arms, Self-Defense, Castle Law, Collin County,Collin County District Attorney, Evidence Tampering, Frisco Texas Police Department, Lindsey Byers Assistant District Attorney Collin County Texas, Greg Willis Collin County District Attorney, Malicious Prosecution, altered evidence, tampering with government records, Right to Bear Arms, Castle Law, Collin County Assistant District Attorney John Schomberger, False Arrest, Police Corruption and Abuse, Militant Militarized Police Force, Police-Assisted Theft in Collin County, Conspiracies and the Law, RICO, Color of Law, Civil Rights Abuses by Police, Police abuse

MOTION TO QUASH INDICTMENT

Research on Conspiracies and the Law

Interesting read!

http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R41223.pdf

More Crazy Stuff from Judge Teresa Hawthorne's Court

We may not speak "lawyerese", but we can tell if something isn't right or ethical.

Notice the stamp that is on the back of the Order Designating Issues.    Look below at the stamp and the "Order".   There are multiple things we are concerned with when we look at these documents.

1)  Is it customary for a document to be "Witnessed" the day PRIOR to it being ordered by the Judge?  Scroll down and note the date the order was signed by the Judge.   This stamp appears on the back of the "Order designating Issues".

2)  When you combine the fact that the SAME attorney (was appointed by the Judge to do this function, when the day PRIOR she was appointed to represent Paul Bailey- how do you account for that?

3)  The appointment of this attorney, is on the docket (see below), but was NEVER SENT TO PAUL BAILEY AND THE ATTORNEY, APRIL E. SMITH,  HAS STILL NOT RESPONDED TO HIS REQUEST FOR CONTACT- we are attaching the image of the certified mail return receipt below.    How was he supposed to know that he had an attorney appointed without a letter from the court unless a friend or family member happened to see the docket.  Remember, he had no attorney that was monitoring his case.

4)   This "Order Designating Issues" (for the court) was sent to Paul Bailey in prison, BUT IT IS NOT ON THE DOCKET.

You can see for yourself by clicking here and typing in F1200810 if you'd like to see the latest interactive version of the docket.  We've preserved the images above and below of the dockets for posterity and evidence as future needs may dictate a history.

Under the old case, this is what you see.

Just another in a long list of crudely hilarious missteps by the "court".  Apparently, these lawyer types think no one will know the difference.

We think Judge Hawthorne has higher ambitions after looking at some of her opinions, and the fact that she calls herself a "Democrat" and in a Red state doesn't have much competition in primaries.   Democrats are supposed to believe in equality and fairness for all people,  even poor people.  Trust me, I don't want her type representing me on anything.   We hope someone runs against her next year.  We plan on providing all these documents to her opposition.

What was Judge Teresa Hawthorne of the 203rd Judicial District Court thinking?

Take a look at both of these documents.  They appoint the exact same Attorney April Smith in each document.  Take note of the duties that attorney April Smith is to perform.  Also note that these documents were signed within ONE DAY of each other by Judge Teresa Hawthorne.   How could she not remember a document she signed previously and not realize she just ordered an Attorney to do a job with an obvious conflict of interest?   By the way, Mr Bailey has had no contact from his new attorney.   Wonder why?  He believes this is to stall him from having this whole episode overturned.

Also note that the appointment of counsel for indigent defendant was posted on the court's website.   But the order designating issues was NOT posted on the website but WAS sent to Mr. Bailey.  How does this type of thing occur?  The final image is the stamped back of the order showing it was stamped by the court.

Dallas Case : COURT ORDERED CONFLICT OF INTEREST?

Dallas Appointment Of Counsel


Dallas states response to habeas


Dallas Write


Exhibit 11 Motion for Discovery


Note in file for JR Cook001


Rule to show cause