ABSOLUTE AUTHORITY, ABSOLUTE POWER, ABSOLUTE CORRUPTION IN COLLIN AND DALLAS COUNTY COURTROOMS

By Paul Bailey

Paul Bailey has learned the hard way that there are basic rules of law practiced by State of Texas. Bailey contends it’s imperative that everyone be confident of these laws, laws that provide the foundation for which the prison system is supplied a steady flow of occupants. Laws that represent precisely why district attorneys and judges, most specifically Dallas and Collin County but includes many others in Texas should not go unopposed in election.

Such is why, excuse me, I mean how district attorneys are able to maintain their totally unqualified conviction rate, they relearned these basic rules of law early on, it took Michael Morton 25 years of illegal incarceration to realize that these rules of law shrunk any legitimate judicial process.

Bailey does however also realize that the numerous acts of judicial misconduct that he has endured far outnumber those committed in Morton's case. He also realized that those that have participated in his highly illegal, malicious prosecution may not intend to for him to spend 25 years incarcerated, they intend to for Bailey to be released as soon as possible in a wooden box. Bailey continually asserts he fears only the one that can kill the soul not the body however.

As we said in our first edition of this article, the acts of judicial misconduct in the Michael Morton case paled in comparison to Bailey's case. The parties involved in the egregious acts of malicious prosecution range from multiple levels of the judiciary from local, county, state and even federal officials. The blatant violations of law in order to cover up malfeasance, dereliction of duty and police misalaniouism requires the best of the best of the most corrupt. Perhaps some participants may have thus far been reluctant participants, Bailey suspects Judge Ray Wheless is one. However Judge Teresa Hawthorne offered unfettered, pompous disregard for proper judicial procedure alliance quite willingly as is the Dallas DA and certainly his court appointed pretender J.R Crook (I mean JR Cook).

Which brings us to yet another violation/disregard for the proper judicial process and/or application of law. Cook’s participation revealed in his disregard for the properly filed, filing of a quash motion, J.R. Cook not only refused to file he left Bailey to argue the motion to the illegal indictment and Hawthorne allowed the DA to side step this quash and illegally charge me for a debt discharged in bankruptcy.

Had Cook had any regard whatsoever of properly defending Bailey, just let it be dismissed now. Even after prompting by Bailey’s daughter and numerous text messages and phone calls ending in a faux pas by Cook, deliberate faux pas we must add that ended in Bailey’s conviction.

So along with the obviously properly dismissed as civil dispute investigation by Detective Cox of the Dallas Police FBI Cyber Squad we shall include the disregard/ineffective council and by the way Judge Hawthorne, J.R. Cook was Bailey’s court appointed attorney at the time of the quashed motion contrary to your pompous remarks to my friend (her initials are DM and yes she prepared an affidavit of her mistreatment by JR Cook and Judge Teresa Hawthorne the day she went down to obtain a copy of the transcripts for me.

There are so many other illegal or illegalities such as allowing a postdated foreign power of attorney/affidavit to be submitted in the court by the so called victim and we haven’t touched on filing federal bankruptcy law by going so far as to include the quash as part of Bailey’s Writ of Habeas. Moreover, the malicious prosecution is obvious.

TO BE CONTINUED....

THE MURDERS JUST HAVEN'T BEEN REPORTED YET- PAUL BAILEY SUSPECTS FOUL PLAY IN SUSPICIOUS DEATHS

The following article was written by Paul Bailey and transcribed from his recorded statements.

Was my Bankruptcy Attorney murdered just like Detective Debra Stansell?  We will let you decide by letting our readers examine the documents following this article.

As one of the great jailhouse lawyers of all time, David Hernandez at the Lynaugh Unit said to me when quoting ex parte Taylor, 36 S.W. 3rd 88387; the Texas Criminal Appeals 2001 quotes "The state of Texas has only one indivisible interests in a criminal prosecution: To see that the justice is done."

“I almost puked," Hernandez said. Nothing can be said that is more audacious than an ex parte Taylor, nor embodies a greater oxymoron. I shall endeavor to say that my incessant insinuation that the influential judiciary and law enforcement may meet with some sense of demise is not so audacious. Consider, if you will, the suspicious circumstances that surround the death of Frisco P.D.'s Detective Debra Stancil and one attorney now deceased, Jim Baumgartner; both key and the defense prosecution of Paul Bailey of Frisco, Texas.

A defense that has met with every conceivable malfeasance, judicial illegality and misconduct that stands to reveal the cover up of the most egregious, law enforcement involvement, collusive act of dereliction vigilantism. The now disturbing likelihood that my Attorney and friend as he was good at both, Baumgartner met with the same fate as Detective Debra Stansell of Frisco P.D. is , as I've said, 'disturbing'. I shall never forget the frightful alarm in my daughter, Kimberly's voice, when she informed me that like Debra Stansell, Jim had died an untimely death which would hurt my defense.

The subpoena that I had requested only a week earlier had yet to be served. With only a day or two before my trial I had solicited my daughter to contact Jim herself because my court appointed investigator said he could not contact him or serve him. My daughter’s words: "Dad! Jim died yesterday! Oh my God. Nobody seems to know what happened! He just died! What's going on here? First Debra Stansell, now Jim Baumgartner?"

Jim Baumgartner's testimony in my trial would- I said 'would'- that there be no misunderstanding; I did not say "should" or "could", I said "would"- have ended the highly illegal prosecution of aggravated theft and I would have been freed on bond soon thereafter. Free to pursue my appeal for the now proven actual innocent charge in Collin County. You remember the one which he inevitably revealed Frisco P.D.'s multiple acts of malfeasance, vigilantism and tampering with evidence. Oh, yeah. Agreeing to continue exposing the aforementioned criminal acts on this blog properly, this post is but a taste of what is yet to come as the Dallas County's illegal prosecution will be rightly be exposed regardless of the audacious.

I just had to let the world know to be paying attention for soon all will see that Jim's untimely death, like Debra Stansell's, deserves a proper review. As to Judge Willis, Rhodes and Detective Cox- all of which hold positions of power- in wielding true justice in my behalf and exposing many corrupt law enforcement and judiciary officials. They may want to watch their backs.

Check the shadows and be Cognizant of whatever they eat or drink. Oh, yeah, one more thing. Keep it on the QT with their spouses. I really don't want to write anymore audacious circumstance articles. I have to write an article or two about all the mail interruptions or how such preventive- proper, or awful, or timely- legal instruments, objections from being filed. You know the kind I mean. The ones that would overtake justice, "exposing the corruption that is covering up corruption".

Like the last objection that has yet to be received and filed, that will bring light to Texas' Court appointing the fox to watch the hen house that Collin County may be available at the time of this post. Or in the case of Judge Rhodes who will have a renewed opportunity to make a just ruling and join/vacate the illegal and/or void judgment of the Dallas Case. I certainly hope she's around to do so. The Dallas D.A. probably thinks I'm barking up the wrong tree, but that's alright. They have underestimated me before.

Funny how the Lord works. Evil intentions and lets evil dig its own grave. When lies cause lies sometimes the new lies pick up new ones, too. Soon all will know what I mean. Just hoping that nothing more audacious happens. Have a blessed day.

ATTORNEY APRIL E SMITH, ATTORNEY J.R. COOK, JUDGE TERESA HAWTHORNE, TEXAS COUNTRY CLUB OF JUDICIAL CORRUPTION, JUDGE RHODES, MALICIOUS PROSECUTION, DOUBLE JEOPARDY IN TEXAS COURTROOM, JUDGE TERESA HAWTHORNE'S COURT ORDERED CONFLICT OF INTEREST, JUDGE TERESA HAWTHORNE MANIPULATES THE DOCKET, POLICE CORRUPTION AND ABUSE

WHY THE DALLAS CASE WAS BOGUS AND CHARGED PAUL BAILEY ILLEGALLY

This is a page from the Enjoin Motion filed which points out the law which shows very clearly why Paul Bailey was illegally tried.   The entire case was one to assist Collin County to get Paul Bailey away from his blog and create havoc for him so he couldn't fight the Collin County coverup/crimes.   In addition, the Judge Bench warranted him months before his trial in Dallas INTENTIONALLY so he could not attend his hearing for new trial.

Paul believes God is in control since he now has proof that the Evidence in Collin County was tampered with.

At any rate, here's the page that talks about why you can't be charged with theft after you file bankruptcy (this is after the car buyers never answered phone calls or emails for months to accept delivery of the cars).   

MOTION TO QUASH INDICTMENT

More Crazy Stuff from Judge Teresa Hawthorne's Court

We may not speak "lawyerese", but we can tell if something isn't right or ethical.

Notice the stamp that is on the back of the Order Designating Issues.    Look below at the stamp and the "Order".   There are multiple things we are concerned with when we look at these documents.

1)  Is it customary for a document to be "Witnessed" the day PRIOR to it being ordered by the Judge?  Scroll down and note the date the order was signed by the Judge.   This stamp appears on the back of the "Order designating Issues".

2)  When you combine the fact that the SAME attorney (was appointed by the Judge to do this function, when the day PRIOR she was appointed to represent Paul Bailey- how do you account for that?

3)  The appointment of this attorney, is on the docket (see below), but was NEVER SENT TO PAUL BAILEY AND THE ATTORNEY, APRIL E. SMITH,  HAS STILL NOT RESPONDED TO HIS REQUEST FOR CONTACT- we are attaching the image of the certified mail return receipt below.    How was he supposed to know that he had an attorney appointed without a letter from the court unless a friend or family member happened to see the docket.  Remember, he had no attorney that was monitoring his case.

4)   This "Order Designating Issues" (for the court) was sent to Paul Bailey in prison, BUT IT IS NOT ON THE DOCKET.

You can see for yourself by clicking here and typing in F1200810 if you'd like to see the latest interactive version of the docket.  We've preserved the images above and below of the dockets for posterity and evidence as future needs may dictate a history.

Under the old case, this is what you see.

Just another in a long list of crudely hilarious missteps by the "court".  Apparently, these lawyer types think no one will know the difference.

We think Judge Hawthorne has higher ambitions after looking at some of her opinions, and the fact that she calls herself a "Democrat" and in a Red state doesn't have much competition in primaries.   Democrats are supposed to believe in equality and fairness for all people,  even poor people.  Trust me, I don't want her type representing me on anything.   We hope someone runs against her next year.  We plan on providing all these documents to her opposition.

What was Judge Teresa Hawthorne of the 203rd Judicial District Court thinking?

Take a look at both of these documents.  They appoint the exact same Attorney April Smith in each document.  Take note of the duties that attorney April Smith is to perform.  Also note that these documents were signed within ONE DAY of each other by Judge Teresa Hawthorne.   How could she not remember a document she signed previously and not realize she just ordered an Attorney to do a job with an obvious conflict of interest?   By the way, Mr Bailey has had no contact from his new attorney.   Wonder why?  He believes this is to stall him from having this whole episode overturned.

Also note that the appointment of counsel for indigent defendant was posted on the court's website.   But the order designating issues was NOT posted on the website but WAS sent to Mr. Bailey.  How does this type of thing occur?  The final image is the stamped back of the order showing it was stamped by the court.

How can the same person represent him while remaining independent and preparing findings of fact and conclusions of law for the court?

Dallas Case : COURT ORDERED CONFLICT OF INTEREST?

Dallas Appointment Of Counsel


Dallas states response to habeas


Dallas Write


Exhibit 11 Motion for Discovery


Note in file for JR Cook001


Rule to show cause

Dallas Case: More Information

Mr Bailey received a different document from the Judge that is not listed online for the case.   He is reading it in the audio attached.   How can a court appointed attorney represent Mr. Bailey and also NOT represent Mr. Bailey by being an independent fact finder for the court?

Also how can Mr Bailey answer specifics if the Judge will not give him the court transcripts and supporting evidence requested in the show cause document?    These documents were also requested by someone Mr. Bailey gave power of attorney to and she was accused of "practicing law without a license".   Yes, we will post the affidavit soon.

How can a previously discharged in bankruptcy debt become a crime?


How can a faulty indictment, be amended illegally, be then thrown out (thus clearing him of the crime) and then the amended indictment (for the same transaction), be allowed to stand and then result in double jeopardy in the same trial?   This crazy stuff can only happen in Texas!

Here is a recording created using HT Professional Recorder:

Dallas Irregularities- Why would Judge Teresa Hawthorne Sign this Document and what was her motive?

Just another in a long string of irregularities on the Dallas Case.    with all of this happening in the same trial, there may be lawsuits for years!

In a nutshell this is what has happened:

1) Mr. Bailey was told that a key witness has long since retired (when he was not!),  

2) a discharged in bankruptcy debt being the reason Mr. Bailey was tried (what if Wall Street Banksters and  corporate raiders were held to the same standards?),  

3) a faulty indictment amended illegally and then the original indictment thrown out at the last minute thereby aquitting him, but the jury deliberated on the amended indictment (double jeopardy occurred in the same trial!),  

4)Judge Teresa Hawthorne denying Mr. Bailey trial transcripts so he can prepare for his appeal (knowing full well he is indigent), and 

5) now this document sent from Mr. Bailey showing another attorney that never worked on this case showing up as the Attorney of Record, when JR Cook was the attorney that sat beside Mr. Bailey at trial.

WHAT WERE THE MOTIVES BEHIND ALL THIS MESS?