Tuesday, June 11, 2013

Why Mr. Bailey wouldn't accept the plea deal

THE EXECUTIONERS AT THE  FRISCO PD RIGGED THE WHOLE EVENT SO THAT I COULD NOT TAKE THE DAMN THING ~!!!!!!!! BUT NEVER MIND ABOUT THAT RIGHT NOW ......JUST SCROLL DOWN AND READ WHAT JAMES WHALEN WROTE !!!   NO "OFF THE RECORD DEAL, HUH?"

From: paul bailey <baileypaul@att.net>
Subject: RE: Forth Coming
To: "James Whalen" <JWhalen@whalenlawoffice.com>
Cc: "Chad Deaver" <cdeaver@whalenlawoffice.com>
Date: Thursday, August 27, 2009, 12:00 AM

I will NOT EXCEPT ANY CHARGE. I did not know....think ...or in anyway believe that I was shooting AT ANYBODY .........AND NOR DID I I EVER SEE ANYONE, PERIOD !!!!!!!!!!
 This is all about CYA for the city of Frisco because they know I will be filling a civil case...bottom line. 
Lets go with the polygraph and structure it that way.
I WILL NOT CONCEDE ANYTHING LESS THAN THEY DROP ALL CHARGES PERIOD......ARE YOU CLEAR ON THAT?
I WANT MY GUN BACK AND WANT TO MAKE CLEAR THAT I INTEND TO MAKE CLEAR WHERE AND WHOM I GOT IT FROM [PETER STRICKLIN UNDERCOVER INFORMANT FOR THE FBI]....LET'S SEE IF THEY WANT TO PLAY UNWINDING COUNTY...STATE ...AND FED CASES.
THIS IS WAR ......AND I INTEND TO WIN IT!!!  FUCK FRISCO PD AND THE DERILICT OFFICERS....THERE IS NO TURNING BACK
JUST GET ME AND THIS PROSECUTOR IN THE SAME ROOM.
AND THE JUDGE IS DAMN SURE WELCOME !!!!

 Done it before ....NO MORE....NOT THIS TIME I WILL FIGHT TO THE DEATH!

no deals no deals no deals no deals no deals no deals no deals no deals no deals

--- On Wed, 8/26/09, James Whalen <JWhalen@whalenlawoffice.com> wrote:

From: James Whalen <JWhalen@whalenlawoffice.com>
Subject: RE: Forth Coming
To: "paul bailey" <baileypaul@att.net>
Date: Wednesday, August 26, 2009, 5:37 PM

Paul,

I spoke to the prosecutor today and here is what I learned.  The proposed charge is that you intentionally or knowingly threatened a person with a deadly weapon.  They are not charging you with Aggravated Assault on a Public Servant, so that appears to me to be a concession that you didn’t know that the person was a police officer.  That then raises the question, did you ever see anyone outside at all?  Because if you didn’t know anyone what outside, then you couldn’t have knowingly and intentionally threatened someone with a deadly weapon.  Also, I want you to think about whether we suggest in our Grand Jury letter that the discharge of the firearm is a misdemeanor offense and/or disorderly conduct?  The prosecutor did state that this is a strange case but wasn’t willing to not present it to the Grand Jury.  So those are my thoughts for now.  I look forward to seeing you tomorrow.



IN ORDER TO INFORM MR TAYLOR THAT THIS REPRESENTS HIS VERY FIRST
INQUIRY/COMMUNICATION  EMAIL THAT YOU SENT ME IN HIS BEHALF,
 CONCERNING MY CASE

. IT IS A END OF A PATTERN

IT IS NOT A HELLO, NOR DOES IT IN ANY WAY ADDRESS THE MATTERS OF MY
 CASE, DEFENSE OR EVEN THE SUBSTANCE OF THE CHARGE I FACED.
 IT ADDRESSES ONLY HIS CONCERN AS TO MY PREVIOUS REPRESENTATION. 
IT IS A BLATANT, ARROGANT AND DISRESPECTFUL REPRESENTATION THAT 
REFLECTS HIS UTTER DISREGARD FOR MY CONCERNS, NOT ONLY IS IT 
CONSISTENT TO A PATTERN OF MAL-PRACTICE AND LACK OF LEGAL 
REPRESENTATION, NOT TO MENTION ABSENT THE LEAST BIT OF EMPATHY.

THOUGH I AM NOT OF THE BELIEF THAT MR TAYLOR'S JOB IS TO BE MY PRIEST OR COUNSELOR, HE IS SUPPOSE TO BE MY LEGAL COUNSEL 



Marie Massey

 to me
show details 9/9/10
Paul,

Mr. Taylor has asked for a list of your previous court appointed attorneys and the reason they withdrew or were excused.
- Show quoted text -

Post a Comment