Pages

Thursday, August 1, 2013

What was Judge Teresa Hawthorne of the 203rd Judicial District Court thinking?

Take a look at both of these documents.  They appoint the exact same Attorney April Smith in each document.  Take note of the duties that attorney April Smith is to perform.  Also note that these documents were signed within ONE DAY of each other by Judge Teresa Hawthorne.   How could she not remember a document she signed previously and not realize she just ordered an Attorney to do a job with an obvious conflict of interest?   By the way, Mr Bailey has had no contact from his new attorney.   Wonder why?  He believes this is to stall him from having this whole episode overturned.

Also note that the appointment of counsel for indigent defendant was posted on the court's website.   But the order designating issues was NOT posted on the website but WAS sent to Mr. Bailey.  How does this type of thing occur?  The final image is the stamped back of the order showing it was stamped by the court.









2 comments:

  1. I sent you a link via email to the only interaction I had with Hawthorne... If it can be of any use to you, use it, and read the whole story, including the comments, her full, and incredibly STUPID email IS documented...

    That woman is a nut case..

    ReplyDelete
  2. You might find this very interesting…

    http://www.texasfred.net/archives/7795

    Hawthorne is the person in the story, she is so far out in LEFT field she’s in a different time zone… This woman has NO business sitting on a bench, well, maybe a park bench...

    ReplyDelete

You may comment as to any content within my blog in two categories
The first or category #1 is "Fact or Verifiable" and must be "title" as such. You can then post any verifiable or factual information that you feel is relevant to my Blog. You must include the source with your comment.
The second category #2 is "My Opinion" and must be title as such. Only opinions relevant to the Blog in story line or related events or issues may be posted. Any ramblings that do not support a constructive view will be removed. You opinion must either agree or be opposing with a specific topic that relates to the story and/or events and issues of my Blog, being at the core of your opinion, and be articulated in some form of reference.