Just another in a long string of irregularities on the Dallas Case. with all of this happening in the same trial, there may be lawsuits for years!
In a nutshell this is what has happened:
1) Mr. Bailey was told that a key witness has long since retired (when he was not!),
2) a discharged in bankruptcy debt being the reason Mr. Bailey was tried (what if Wall Street Banksters and corporate raiders were held to the same standards?),
3) a faulty indictment amended illegally and then the original indictment thrown out at the last minute thereby aquitting him, but the jury deliberated on the amended indictment (double jeopardy occurred in the same trial!),
4)Judge Teresa Hawthorne denying Mr. Bailey trial transcripts so he can prepare for his appeal (knowing full well he is indigent), and
5) now this document sent from Mr. Bailey showing another attorney that never worked on this case showing up as the Attorney of Record, when JR Cook was the attorney that sat beside Mr. Bailey at trial.
WHAT WERE THE MOTIVES BEHIND ALL THIS MESS?
No comments:
Post a Comment
You may comment as to any content within my blog in two categories
The first or category #1 is "Fact or Verifiable" and must be "title" as such. You can then post any verifiable or factual information that you feel is relevant to my Blog. You must include the source with your comment.
The second category #2 is "My Opinion" and must be title as such. Only opinions relevant to the Blog in story line or related events or issues may be posted. Any ramblings that do not support a constructive view will be removed. You opinion must either agree or be opposing with a specific topic that relates to the story and/or events and issues of my Blog, being at the core of your opinion, and be articulated in some form of reference.